Organizational Management


Too often we find ourselves in a system that is flawed by organizational road blocks.  Set in their ways, managers insist that , “it’s my way or the highway.”  The inefficiencies in the system are a failure of management to see how today’s problems are a product of yesterday’s solutions.  Typically system failures are often ignored, employees become frustrated and often leave, feedback is undervalued and little or no change occurs.  Often we are told and encouraged to think creativity, except when it comes to challenging the system.  To speak out puts a target on your back and could possibly be grounds for dismissal no matter how valuable you maybe to the organization.  For some it is simply easier to go through the motions than to put the time and energy into creating a learning organization.  Where is our leader?

While completing my MBA in 2010 from the University of Nevada,  I had the pleasure of reading Peter Senge’s book The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning OrganizationIt elaborated on the 5 disciplines’:  system thinking, achieving personal mastery, shifting mental modes, building shared vision, and team learning.  Senge is hopeful these 5 disciplines’ will create waves of experimentation, advancement, and hopefully “learning organizations” in which “people continually expand their capacity to create results they truly desire.”  That being said, leaders need to continue to challenge the status quo and look at ways to improve the system.   Singe concludes, “the systems viewpoint is generally oriented toward the long-term view. That’s why delays and feedback loops are so important.  In the short term, you can often ignore them; they’re inconsequential. They only come back to haunt you in the long term.”  Don’t wait for someone else, take a proactive approach and help find resolve now rather than later.

In the post Don’t Miss Your Big Picture, Bret Simmons discusses how “seeing the big picture” is the ability to understand  how to take actions today that will produce significant and lasting results now and in the future.  He firmly believes that anyone who masters the discipline of systems thinking will be a much better leader than someone who only sees their situations as snapshots.  I cannot agree more with this previous sentence.   Becoming a greater systems thinker, you will become a better leader and others will begin to see your value.

So, why do we continue to quietly mutter among ourselves instead of being proactive?  Are we afraid of the ramifications for speaking out?  If we stand united, determined to find resolve, we can ultimately fix the problem.  This is not easy, especially in egotistical corporate structure where everyone is vying for more control and power.  One way to stimulate change is to simply ask questions in a non-threatening manner.  Another way is to gain a consensus among fellow employees by kicking around ideas how to make the system better.  Too often companies fail to bring the appropriate voices into a committee but rather create subsystems that perpetuate the actual problems.  I would like to hear your input and how you have navigated these rocky waters to improve your system.

CRUX: Continually challenge the status quo by questioning your current system.  By being and thinking outside the box,  we will continue to help the organization excel.  Discovering which approach works best and timing your suggestions will help you continue to change your system from a non-threatening leadership role.

“Every human has four endowments- self awareness, conscience, independent will and creative imagination. These give us the ultimate human freedom… The power to choose, to respond, to change.” -Stephen Covey

This case study is about job dissatisfaction and its high turnover rate. Many individuals were highly dissatisfied  with how they were treated at a Treadway Tire Company. The system is definitely broken and we see that played out here from the very first sentence, “We have a serious problem.”

The line foreman lack the proper training needed to excel and they have a horrible relationship with their direct superior. There are two reasons why many line foreman ended up leaving the company: 1) they didn’t have the proper training to do their job right, 2) there was tension between the line foreman and their superiors. Instead of handing the foreman the tools and skills needed to perform the job the bosses just demanded results. The bosses often threatened the foreman in hopes of getting the job done. The lack of leadership and a high Mach approach ultimately caused the system to fail.

One positive aspect was how the foreman were compensated with a high level of pay.  The men were being paid $30/hr and had the opportunity for overtime. This furthermore proves pay isn’t the factor that will make you stay at your job. The percentage of foreman who continued working at Treadway may have just need the money to survive and therefore were stuck in the job.

Earlier this semester we discussed the idea of having the ability to leave your job and not be imprisoned. It appears the percentage of individuals who left did so because they could and the individuals who continue to work the foreman position are doing so because they didn’t have an alternative solution.  They may have a family, house, and kids and can’t just up and quit. I am glad I haven’t had to experience a job like this!

CRUX:  Empower your employees, treat them with respect, and be someone your employees would follow.

This is a great article about sharpening the leadership skills of current executives who are already set in there ways.  It can be a very challenging task, especially when there is a generational difference in the workplace. Instead of forcing these new ideas upon the older executives we need to disguise it.  In away we are making them think that they came up with the idea but we are actually feeding them the thought until it clicks.

The steps to more successful transition are as follows:

-First build a new relationship

-Create a performance agreement

-Serve and lead

These three steps are very valuable when it comes to the transitioning process.  The first step is a horizontal relationship with mutal respect and equality. Secondly, create a mutal up-front agreement regarding the expectations. Lastly, after everyone buys into the agreement do whatever neccessary to achieve the desired results.

CRUX:  Leaders need to lead and be there to serve the company. They need to do what is best for the company and not themselves. Over time the implementation of these steps will lead to a more successful company.

This is an article about a Marine Col. Joe Dowdy who was immediately removed from his command for not following his field orders. I believe Col. Dowdy values blinded his judgment which ultimately lead to his abrupt dismissal. In a decision when he should have been making judgements based on logic he was actually operating based on emotions.  His idea of how to lead was actually quite different then then his superiors and ultimately sentenced his own dismissal.

I don’t know which way I lean with this article.  Col. Dowdy performed well and successfully led his troops into battle.  They successfully completed a high-speed race through Iraq in 18 hours on their mission to Baghdad.  His dismissal came shortly after the completion of the mission for not completing it a faster pace.  Col Dowdy’s relationship with his troops caused him to think of safety rather than speed.

CRUX:  In order to be a great leader we must first learn to follow.  Master following and you will create followers.

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.